Decision-Theoretic Question Generation for Situated Reference Resolution: An Empirical Study and Computational Model

2021

Conference: Proceedings of ICMI

Felix Gervits and Gordon Briggs and Anthony Roque and Genki Kadomatsu and Dean Thurston and Matthew Marge and Matthias Scheutz

We analyzed dialogue data from an interactive study in which participants controlled a virtual robot tasked with organizing a set of tools while engaging in dialogue with a live, remote experimenter. We discovered a number of novel results, including the distribution of question types used to resolve ambiguity and the influence of dialogue-level factors on the reference resolution process. Based on these empirical findings we: (1) developed a computational model for clarification requests using a decision network with an entropy-based utility assignment method that operates across modalities, (2) evaluated the model, showing that it outperforms a slot-filling baseline in environments of varying ambiguity, and (3) interpreted the results to offer insight into the ways that agents can ask questions to facilitate situated reference resolution.

@inproceedings{gervitsetal21icmi,
  title={Decision-Theoretic Question Generation for Situated Reference Resolution: An Empirical Study and Computational Model},
  author={Felix Gervits and Gordon Briggs and Anthony Roque and Genki Kadomatsu and Dean Thurston and Matthew Marge and Matthias Scheutz},
  year={2021},
  booktitle={Proceedings of ICMI},
  url={https://hrilab.tufts.edu/publications/gervitsetal21icmi.pdf}
}